Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Jay.Tee.Els

Jay.Tee.Els - IMP: Trial Moderator Application

Recommended Posts

  • Current in-game alias/rank:


    (Inquisitor) Jay
  • Previous Notable Names/Ranks/Positions


    Coma - Event Master (CWRP)
  • Steam ID:


    STEAM_0:1:92040282
  • Steam Profile Link:


  • List your current playtime (in hours) on our RP servers:


    269
  • What is your age? (Minimum of 14 years of age.)


    19
  • How well known are you on a scale of 1-10?


    7
  • Do you have Teamspeak 3 installed?


    Yes
  • Do you enjoy helping other people?


    Yes
  • Are you willing to test your stress?


    Yes
  • Do you believe you're able to deal with individuals and situations in a completely unbiased manner?


    Yes
  • Do you have any problems with any of our current staff members?


    No
  • Are you willing to learn new ways to approach situations?


    Yes
  • Do you have any active warns?


    I do not have any warnings on Imperial RP.
  • How will you becoming a moderator impact our community?


    I have had countless experiences as Admin, Moderator, and so on within a few DarkRP servers over the last 4-5 years. About 5 years ago on a particular DarkRP server is when I especially learned about the consequences that will come with abusing ULX. I can remain calm under pressure and keep a consistent un-bias outlook on each and every scenario. Due to my previous experiences as staff, I have learned how to, and most importantly how not to approach scenarios and members of the community as a staff member. As I am now 19, I have even more experience than I did 5 years ago, and I have been Event Master for a decent period of time on the Clone Wars server before I resigned as I was playing consistently for about a year at that time and I decided I wanted to dedicate more time to my personal life. Whilst I was EM, I experienced first-hand being part of a staff team on Gateway Gaming.

    Unfortunately, on the Clone Wars server, I was eventually banned indefinitely due to having 8 total warnings. These 8 warnings were received after I resigned as event master to pursue school work. I do not recall why I lost my way, however, I do take full responsibility for my previous actions. I am grateful for Gateway Gaming giving me a second chance about 6-7 months ago, so following my unban I have donated about 200 dollars to help the server, I have not broken a single rule and have not received a single verbal or written warning on the server in my 11 days of recorded playtime on the server (at the time of this application).

    I do completely understand if my previous ban on CWRP ultimately results in my application getting denied. However, I am applying as I believe these actions are behind me as I'm carving out a new name for myself. I am re-applying simply because I wish to be involved in this type of community once again. My goal as a staff member on Imperial RP is to help create a roleplaying environment in which everyone is comfortable and able to express themselves. This can be improved by helping reduce toxicity in the community and only use the powers granted by ULX in the service of the community and its members. By writing this application, I accept that any ULX powers granted to me will not be used in dis-service or for personal gain. I believe my previous experience as a staff member and what I have learned since will result in a trustworthy member of the staff team.
  • Do you understand that as a member of the Staff Team, your position may be subject to change and / or termination should you not be performing to the degree stipulated? Do you also understand that a staff role is one that comes with the expectation of commiting time to helping the users of the server (Up to 20 hours a week)?


    Yes
  • A user is RDMing and insulting other users. You are the only staff available to deal with the situation. What do you do?


    Due to the nature of the scenario, I would immediately make sure I am cloaked and godded before pursuing the issue in both assumptions presented (This command can be a string of !god & !noclip or !administrate ^- these commands will be bound to separate keys for ease of use. For example, bind "m" "ulx administrate ^". All "ulx ..." commands presented are presumed to be inputted into the Command Console or bound to a key).

    Assuming this scenario was reported through a ticket, I would then teleport to the victim/s through the ticket system or use the !goto command. Assuming I have witnessed this scenario unfold in front of me, I would immediately either strip (!strip @ or !strip user) or freeze (!freeze @ or !freeze user) the RDMer. Before continuing, I would bring (!bring user) the RDMer / abuser to a secluded area to not disturb any ongoing or possible roleplay scenarios, and remove all potential targets for the RDMer. These areas are independent of each map (For example, a high rooftop or warehouse roof on Vardos, or a far mountain on Titan). If possible, I try to not make the user feel claustrophobic to avoid irritating them further, hence resorting to open areas. For the same reason, freezing the user is not the first priority as avoiding irritation helps the sit run smoothly. Upon bringing the RDMer and victim to the secluded area, I would make sure they are stripped or frozen, and then ask for their point of view on why they were RDMing and insulting other users. In both assumptions, I will still check the logs (/logs) to ensure I understand the true extent of the scenario (For example, the user may have been RDMing 10 minutes ago and wasn't reported).

    1. If the RDMer states they were insulting others in response, I would bring the users he mentioned (if not already at the sit) and continue to get their side of the story.
    2. If the RDMer has little reasoning for the insults and has no intent to roleplay, he will be warned for the counts of RDM and NITRP (!warn user <#xRDM, Player Harassment & NITRP.>).
    3. If the RDMer's insults included threats of DDos on the server or the users, he will immediately be banned permanently (!ban user time reason) and the scenario will be reported to higher ranking staff members through Discord and/or TeamSpeak following the user's ban.

    If the sit follows scenario 1, if there is only evidence of "he said this, she said this" and no logs (For example, the abuse was stated over voice communications and no one was recording), this will not be taken as hard proof. Therefore, the RDMer will be punished for the RDMs if they are confirmed as RDM (warn, kick or ban depending on the severity) and verbally warned for the insults. All users will be thanked for their time and returned (!return @, !return user, or ulx return @). Following the conclusion of the sit, the RDMer will be monitored closely (Assuming they weren't kicked or banned & other tickets aren't active) to ensure no more RDMs or insults continue.
  • A user has contested a warn you have given him and proceeds to verbally abuse you, what do you do?


    If the user is contesting a warn, even if they proceed to verbally abuse me, I will never approach this situation with hostility. As a staff member, I will always be open to criticism and take responsibility if I mess up. I will bring (!bring user) the user to a secluded area to avoid disrupting other users and their roleplay. I will continue to politely let the user continue what they were saying (I will try not to interrupt them so they don't get more irritated). As they finish, I will proceed to ask calmy their side of the story and continue to describe my reasoning behind the warn and possibly outline the rule that they broke. If I am proven wrong, however, the warning will be immediately removed through the AWarn menu, and I will apologize for the inconvenience.
    If the warning is valid, however, and the user is still verbally abusing me, I will politely verbally warn them to stop or they will receive a written warning for Staff Abuse. Once all information is supplied to the user, I will ask if they are pleased with the outcome. If not, I will refer to another staff to re-iterate the reasoning behind the warning. Before concluding the sit, they will be thanked for their time and told to not hesitate to contact me for further assistance. The user will then be returned (!return @, !return user, or ulx return @) to their previous location.
  • A user has threatened to DDos and take down the server. What do you do?


    As stated in scenario 1, if a user threatens to DDos the server or other players within the community, he will be banned permanently (!ban user time reason) and the scenario will be reported to higher ranking staff members through Discord and/or TeamSpeak following the user's ban.
  • A Commander and Lieutenant are arguing in front of debrief. It is getting quite heated. The context to the argument is unknown to you. What do you do?


    As this is taking place in front of a debrief and I am unsure of the context, I will immediately ask the current Event Master if this has any involvement with the event. If so, they will be left alone. If the arguing is not a part of the event and is in fact interrupting the debrief and the roleplay for others, they will be politely asked to move out of the area. If the argument is strictly OOC, they will be requested to communicate via Discord and Teamspeak in the future to avoid any further problems. Assuming the argument is in need of a staff member's input, they will be teleported (!bring user or !tp user) to a secluded area to avoid any further interruptions to RP. I will politely ask the two to tell me their individual sides of the story at a time.

    If they do not comply and continue to talk over each other, they will both receive a verbal warning. The verbal warning will not be said with hostility to avoid any further arguments. If both the commander and lieutenant comply, I will listen to both sides of the story and find an agreement that satisfies both parties. If they are unable to agree, they will be told to stay away from each other in the meantime. Before concluding the sit, they will be thanked for their time and told to not hesitate to contact me for further assistance. All users involved will then be returned (!return @, !return user, or ulx return @) to their previous locations.
  • A Cadet has been complaining and wandering around because he hasn't been trained yet. He doesn't appear to have any intent to role play. What do you do?


    If the cadet has been complaining and wandering around, I will enable administration mode (!administrate ^, ulx administrate ^) so other players know I am not in roleplay. I will continue to go into the cadet room and teleport the cadet (!tp user, !bring user), where they will be told to stay whilst they wait for a SGT+ (This scenario is assuming I am not eligible to train the cadet and/or cannot as there are other tickets active). I will then request in OOC for a SGT+ to train a cadet in the cadet training room.
    If the cadet has NITRP to an extent where he is breaking server rules before or during the training, he will be issued a verbal warning. If the cadet continues to waste the SGT's time, the cadet will be warned (!warn user No intent to RP). After the warning, if they continue they will be kicked (!kick user Continuous NITRP after warnings), and then banned if the user pursues further to show mingey behavior. The ban will last anywhere between 2-4 days so if the user comes back, ideally, they will have more intent to roleplay.
  • Haha 1
  • +1 3

Share this post


Link to post



User will undergo a 2 week trial.

Share this post


Link to post

Accepted.

Jay has passed his Trial period and has become a Moderator. Congratulations.

Share this post


Link to post
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...